"[86], The preceding portion of chapter 16 tells how Mary Magdalene and two other women came to the tomb, found it opened and Jesus's body missing, and were told by a young man in a white robe to convey a message to Peter and the other disciples, but the women fled and said nothing to anyone because they were frightened. This seemingly trivial innovation immediately caught on and can be seen in many bibles of his era, and is still in use today I pray thee hide it not from me: God do so to thee, and more also, if thou hide any thing from me of all the things that he said unto thee. The resulting text looks like this (from the Revised Version): RV: 6 Who moreover assayed to profane the temple; on whom we also laid hold;8 from whom thou wilt be able, by examining him thyself, to take knowledge of all these things, whereof we accuse him. Why are physically impossible and logically impossible concepts considered separate in terms of probability? RV: (verse omitted from main text, in footnote with comment, "Some ancient authorities insert verse 29"), Reason: This verse is lacking in the oldest sources p74, , A,B,E,, several minuscules, some Italic, Vulgate, Syriac, Ethiopic, and Coptic mss, and the Armenian and Georgian versions. 1583 and 1594 show that the translators of 1611 simply adopted a rendering that had already obtained currency. Although this may be true, the OED adds quickly that The phrase, however, was early misapprehended (perh. Some versions, including pre-KJV versions such as the Tyndale Bible, the Geneva Bible, and the Bishops Bible, treat the italicized words as a complete verse and numbered as 12:18, with similar words. The King James Version (KJV) of The Bible was published in 1611 and was based upon analysing multiple previous copies of Bibles and manuscripts available at the time. By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. But with the money making skills of modern translators, there are . [18] In modern conservative Greek editions it is also omitted from the main text of Scrivener's Greek NT according to the Textus Receptus, and the two Majority Text editions. [112], It would appear that the Longer Ending does not fit precisely with the preceding portion of chapter 16. How to Choose a Translation for All Its Worth by Fee & Strauss. Not only does verse 9 not fit onto verse 8, but the texture of what follows is quite different from the texture of what precedes. Reason: Although this verse, or something similar to it, is quite old, it does not appear in the oldest manuscripts, and the manuscripts that do contain it are inconsistent about its text. Bible editions of the American Bible Union. Answer (1 of 7): Jims answer has it here: So, the Catholic Old Testament has everything the Protestant and Jewish Old Testament does, with the addition of the Books of Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Sirach, Baruch, 1st Maccabees, and 2nd Maccabees, as well as extra chapters in Daniel, and 103 extra vers. Want to know what we're up to and when. This, then, is what a person will say who is for evading and entirely getting rid of a gratuitous problem." Many, for example, wish to claim that inspiration did not cease with the death of the last apostle but continued on with the wording of the Greek text that Erasmus, the Roman Catholic scholar, published. Are there tables of wastage rates for different fruit and veg? [116] The shorter ending, in Greek, is approximately (depending on the variants) 32 words long,[117] of which 7 words do not appear elsewhere in Mark. After Luther's rejection, the Catholic Church added them to the Council of Trent. Samuel T. Bloomfield wrote in 1832: "Surely, nothing dubious ought to be admitted into 'the sure word' of 'The Book of Life'. Did Protestants get "Thine is the Kingdom etc" from the Didache? "from evil" (KJV) versus "from the evil one" (NIV). Pastor, Please forgive me to use the words, "Penises." [103] It may be significant that where the Armenian mss do reproduce the Longer Ending, some have conspicuous variants from the Greek version,[104] and a few Armenian mss put the Longer Ending elsewhere than at the end of Mark of the 220 Armenian mss studied, two put the Longer Ending at the end of the Gospel of John, and one puts it at the end of Luke, and one ms has the Longer Ending at the end of Mark and the Shorter Ending at the end of the Gospel of Luke. Some of them are rather minor, some are major. [125] The omission of the Longer Ending in the Codex Vaticanus apparently was not realized again until rediscovered in 1801 by the Danish scholar Andreas Birch (whose discovery got very little publicity owing to a fire that destroyed his newly published book before it could be much distributed). The omission of this clause from Luke 4:8 in critical texts is so well-established that no comment about the omission appears in the Appendix to Westcott & Hort, in Scrivener's Plain Introduction to Textual Criticism, or in the UBS New Testament. The verses in . rev2023.3.3.43278. "[38] It was omitted in the Complutensian edition, and included in Erasmus's editions only because he found it as a late note in the margin of a secondary manuscript and, from Erasmus, it found its way into other Textus Receptus editions and then the KJV. Several 1 placed it at the very end of the Gospel of John, and Scrivener adds several more that have so placed a shorter pericope beginning at verse 8:3. Post author: Post published: June 21, 2022 Post category: ward 26 arrowe park hospital Post comments: patrick brown uoft rate my prof patrick brown uoft rate my prof Yet this error is defended by KJV-only advocates as though it came from the pen of the apostle John himself. Posted on July 4, 2022 by . The NKJV is written as a new translation to reflect better readability and interpretation. But if the Vulgate is divided into 4 then that is long before the thirteenth century. This averages out to one change per 8.83 words. Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professors, theologians, and those interested in exegetical analysis of biblical texts. Verse 36 is included by very few Greek manuscripts of the Western text-type and by Old-Latin and Vulgate manuscripts.[19][20]. Arias Montanus, in his Antwerp Bible of 1571, broke up the Hebrew text itself into chapters and introduced the Hebrew numerals into the body of the text itself (Ginsburg)..". The Revised Version (1881) omitted the italicized words from its main text, making the passage read: " a multitude of them that were sick, blind, halt, withered. Although the longer ending appears in 99 percent of the surviving Greek mss and most ancient versions,[85] there is strong evidence, both external and internal, for concluding that it was not part of the original text of the Gospel. He will not suffer thy foot to be moved: he that keepeth thee will not slumber. On the other hand, these 12 verses occur in slightly less ancient Greek mss, A,C,D,K,,13, and a "vast number" of others,[14] and a great many mss of the ancient versions, and is quoted by some other Church Fathers, the earliest being Irenaeus, in the late second century (although his quotations are imprecise). Another serious mistake in the King James and New King James versions is in 1 John 5:7-8. . The King James Bible Removed Verses October 21, . 2 junio, 2022; couples challenge tiktok; dome structure examples . The KJV was originally published in 1611 by translators who followed 15 principles of translation. My Blog why does the kjv have extra verses. Compare this to other ancient documents. Metzger speaks of the "inconcinnities" [sic] between the first 8 verses of chapter 16 and the longer ending, and suggests, "all these features indicate that the section was added by someone who knew a form of Mark that ended abruptly with verse 8 and who wished to supply a more appropriate conclusion. The KJV often uses the present tense to . ", I John 5:7: "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. You can easily view multiple chapters of the Bible at the same time. [78], There are two passages (both 12 verses long) that continue to appear in the main text of most of the modern versions, but distinguished in some way from the rest of the text, such as being enclosed in brackets or printed in different typeface or relegated to a footnote. why does the kjv have extra verseslivrer de la nourriture non halal [92] It has been suggested or suspected that Jerome's expression of doubt was actually a rehash of the similar comment by Eusebius,[93] but, to the contrary, it is possible that Jerome was unaware of this particular opinion of Eusebius, considering that it was utterly unknown to modern scholars until its fortuitous discovery in 1825. As usual, however, the facts dont bear the critics out. "[47] The verses immediately before verse 24, the verse 24 itself, and the verses following verse 24 show many variations in the surviving manuscripts. This writer made a very interesting argument. Every word in the Bible is described as God breathed and therefore has immense power. A Jewish website http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt1401.htm has the format that the BHS uses of 4 in Joel and 3 in Malachi. v brakes for 650b conversion; nj marching band state championship; doctor handwriting translation app; football pools draws this weekend. (All in bold type omitted in modern versions). (2 Samuel 12:30) And he took their kings crown from off his head, the weight whereof was a talent of gold with the precious stones: and it was set on Davids head. Amen.". Philippians 2:4 - Look not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of others. Is there a single-word adjective for "having exceptionally strong moral principles"? I have then looked at the Vulgate online. The KJV offers beautiful poetic language and a more of a word-for-word approach. Get our Question of the Week delivered right to your inbox! Selah. ', Last edited on 24 February 2023, at 00:55, Today's English Version (the Good News Bible), personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay, Learn how and when to remove this template message, An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture, http://www.asureguidetoheaven.org/onebible.pdf, "Missing Verses & changed words in modern Bibles compared to the KJV? This ought to be a good test-case for whether there are 421 total changes or 100,000 changes to the KJV in its nearly 400-year history. Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. In the least, this puts the matter in a bit of a different light. RV: (omits the words Get thee behind me, Satan:). Then a space of two lines is left, after which, in the same uncial hand, only in red, is written "Ariston Eritzou." 1 According to the software program, Accordance, the KJV has 585, 761 words in the 39 books of the Old Testament that are accepted by Protestants as canonical; the KJV has 180,376 words in the New Testament. This verse first appears, not in a New Testament manuscript, but in a fifth century Confession of Faith, and after that it was assimilated into mss of the Latin Vulgate, but it was (because of the lack of Greek documentary support) omitted from the first two "Textus Receptus" printed editions of the New Testament (namely those edited by Erasmus, 1516 and 1519),[54] as well as some other very early Textus Receptus editions, such as Aldus 1518, Gerbelius 1521, Cephalius 1524 and 1526, and Colinaeus 1534. This Bomberg one is 1525.. https://archive.org/details/RabbinicbibleotMikraotGedolotBombergshebrewtanach.jacobBenChaim.1525. In the words of Philip Schaff, "According to the judgment of the best critics, these two important sections are additions to the original text from apostolic tradition. Some other ancient sources have an entirely different ending to Mark, after verse 8, known as the "Shorter Ending". No papyrus contains any portion of the 12 verses.[88]. why does the kjv have extra verses; why does the kjv have extra verses. The "lost page" theory has gotten wide acceptance,[127] other theories have suggested that the last page was not lost by accident but was deliberately suppressed, perhaps because something in St. Mark's original conclusion was troublesome to certain Christians. Apparently Tischendorff's 1841 Greek NT was the first printed edition to omit this clause. Most critical editions relegated the Comma to a footnote or otherwise marked it as doubtful. Browse other questions tagged, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site. It is not present in the oldest manuscripts of Matthew, but there are versions that include it, so again it is a matter of judgement between the two sets of translators as to which text version is "better". How many chapters did he put in Joel and how many in Malachi? why does the kjv have extra verses. Thet WLC is a digitized form of the BHS. Early Church Fathers did not mention this verse, even when gathering verses to support the Doctrine of the Trinity. It says in the Book of Acts 17:11-12 (KJV) that the men of Berea check and tested everything that Paul and Silas said to them against the Old Testament Scriptures. The pericope does not appear in the oldest Codexes , A,B,C,L,N,T,W,X,,, nor in papyri p66 or p75, nor in minuscules 33, 157, 565, 892, 1241, or 1424 nor in the Peshitta. It is true that there is a small number of Scriptures that are not the same between the King James Bible and the so-called "Majority" Greek text. It is accepted that the bible is the most valuable item that exists on the face of the earth. (2 Samuel 12:22) And he said, While the child was yet alive, I fasted and wept: for I said, Who can tell whether GOD will be gracious to me, that the child may live? The reason is that the MS was a poor translation of the Latin, omitting the article before Father, Word, and Holy Spirit (since there is no article in Latin, the scribe simply transferred the Latin over into the Greek, without making the necessary adjustment). LDS perspective on the New King James Version? And I see that the WLC (aka WTT), which is a digitized BHS, so, the BHS, has 4 chapters in Joel and 3 in Malachi. [107] It appeared in the footnote at this place in the RSV and then in brackets in the main text of the NRSV: RSV & NRSV: But they reported briefly to Peter and those with him all that they had been told. Those which contain it vary much from each other." Unlike the Dan Browns theories the Rose Line or Sangreal, the Bible is the most powerful book in human existence and therefore, only those who are intent on diminishing its powers would ever want to change it. Why does the KJV use (singular) "cometh" as the verb for (plural) "distress and anguish" in Proverbs 1:27? KJV: 6 Who also hath gone about to profane the temple: whom we took, and would have judged according to our law.7 But the chief captain Lysias came upon us, and with great violence took him away out of our hands,8 Commanding his accusers to come unto thee: by examining of whom thyself mayest take knowledge of all these things, whereof we accuse him. Second, when Scott details a handful of changes that are indeed trivial, he says, Friends, this is the ENTIRE extent of the nature of the changes from the King James Bible of 1611 to the King James Bible of the present day. As we mentioned above, that is not correct. KJV: 7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the holy Ghost, and these three are one.8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, Modern versions: (omitted from main text and not in a footnote). Myth 2: Christ and the Apostles regularly referred to Old Testament Scripture as authoritative, but they never referred to or even mentioned the deuterocanonical texts. (In the five words he lists, the total number of changes comes out to 214 changes.) Modern scholars and translators of Bibles like the NIV and ESV intentionally decided to leave out verses like Matthew 18:11. Hath no man condemned thee? And significantly, according to this wikipedia page, the first to print chapter and verse numbers in a hebrew bible. And thats exactly what were supposed to be doing too. Give us day by day . What am I doing wrong here in the PlotLegends specification? At the end of this treatment will be a summary. F. F. Bruce, History of the Bible in English, third edition (Newy York: Oxford University Press, 1978) 108. But KJV-only advocates typically link inspiration to preservation to accessibility in such a way that logically makes printers errors a part of the package. This verse is missing from Tyndale's version (1534) and the Geneva Bible (1557). [111], As a result, there are five possible endings to the Gospel of Mark: (1) An abrupt ending at end of verse 8; (2) the Longer Ending following verse 8; (3) the Longer Ending including the "Freer Logion"; (4) the Shorter Ending following verse 8; and (5) the Shorter and Longer endings combined (and we could add as a sixth possible ending, anything after verse 8 enclosed in brackets or otherwise distinguished with indicia of doubt). Blessed is the man that trusteth in the Lord, and whose hope the Lord is. If I had not have experienced Gods WORD coming to pass in my life I would be thinking of this as another Dan Brown blockbuster about some religious tangent or other. The Lord bless thee, and keep thee: The Lord make his face shine upon thee, and be gracious unto thee: The Lord lift up his countenance upon thee, and give thee peace.